So we've finally settled on a front cover (the back is still evolving). The orange type will be embossed and in a really striking orange foil (!) and the silver is also embossed and in silver foil. The enter key is embossed. Very cool!
The updated version is now displayed on the Amazon and Barnes & Noble listings, where you can pre-order the book, for delivery on July 11th.
Congrats, Chris! Its these moments where the book finally starts to feel real! Looking forward to the read!
-Paul
Posted by: Paul Marino | April 20, 2006 at 12:59 PM
Beautiful and very simple.
In my opinion the Enter button is a bit forced in the design. Maybe a simple Long tail curve would be more interesting.
Anxiously waiting for July 11th.
Andre Ribeirinho
Blog.deLaranja.com
Posted by: Andre Ribeirinho | April 20, 2006 at 03:34 PM
Mr. Anderson,
I like the cover. Simple.
Less is more, right? ;-)
Posted by: jdanylko | April 20, 2006 at 07:12 PM
Nice quote! WOW...I am looking forward to your book and just wanted to say thanks!
Posted by: Eric | April 20, 2006 at 08:34 PM
Nice work.....
I've pre-ordered enough for my team, my investors and those VC's I need to go educate.
Although coincicence only, our Long Tail product goes into Beta on July 12th...interesting.
- David
Posted by: David Armstrong | April 22, 2006 at 06:08 AM
Chris,
Very sharp cover. Looks like it will be a real eye catcher.
Will you be doing a reading and book signing in the Silicon Valley in support of the release?
Best of luck.
PS: I've got my copy on pre-order through Amazon.
Posted by: Carter Lusher | April 26, 2006 at 10:11 AM
They say not to judge the book by it, but the cover looks great. Looking forward to opening it up. Congrats, Chris.
Posted by: David | April 27, 2006 at 02:29 PM
I don't understand what an Enter key has to do with anything your book is supposed to be about.
Just because something is embossed does not mean it's attractive and marketable. Just because something is simple does not mean it's attractive and marketable.
Malcolm Gladwell's single match for The Tipping Point is simple and yet easily associated with his concept.
This "Enter" key ... explain how it relates to the Long Tail. In your March 19, 2006 post, you said, "Publication date is July 11th. Pre-orders available now (ignore the subtitle and cover image, which are both placeholders)." It seemed as if you thought the "Enter" key back then was not a hot idea, but now you come across as if it is a great idea?
Sorry if my opinion seems childish, however: I am not buying the idea the "Enter" key is slick at all, because it is stupid. I know the book publishing process very well; the people who make book covers are idiots and very rarely do authors stick their neck out on the line for a good book cover, because they simply do not know how important it is. Your book cover is bad, period. I will still buy the book, but definitely not based on the cover. If it was on a shelf, I would not touch it if I did not know (a) You are the editor of Wired (b) you have this Blog.
The fact the cover page does not say below your large name, "Editor-in-Chief Wired Magazine" does not make sense to me. It's poor self-promotion not to associate yourself with your stellar magazine writing.
Posted by: John "Z-Bo" Zabroski | April 28, 2006 at 12:27 PM
Why would you use the enter key as a visual metaphor when the entire book is based on the visual metaphor of the long tail curve?
Posted by: Shannon | April 29, 2006 at 08:34 AM
Shannon,
My publisher's thinking is that some readers are put off by graphs and anything that looks too math-ey (feels like homework, not fun). The book is far broader than just the statistical observation, and we wanted it to appeal to the widest audience possible. Don't worry--there are plenty of graphs inside, and the cannonical Long Tail graph is also on the back jacket.
Chris
Posted by: Chris Anderson | April 29, 2006 at 09:03 AM
Well, yeah, putting a mere graph on the cover of a book would not lead to a best-seller either. That's why mainstream art requires creativity. An "Enter" key is not creative, nor is a graph (no matter how creative the underlying idea it expresses is). Your publisher has an argument, but there should be a suitable counter-argument. I would cite to the publisher best-selling books that explain high-level thinking concepts to the masses, and also point out none of them had bad bookcovers... that I could make in photoshop in 10 seconds. Of course, I would try to send more polite than that, but that would be the thought in my head.
Posted by: John "Z-Bo" Zabroski | May 04, 2006 at 10:22 AM
Thanks for your explanation, Chris--I'll read it eagerly no matter what's on the cover.
Posted by: Shannon | May 04, 2006 at 08:13 PM
Chris,
I have been a long-time fan of yours and the long tail graphic identified the concept from the very beginning.
Your publisher has succeeded admirably in debasing the concept visually by pandering to the lowest common denominator.
At this point I wonder what other "advantage" this publisher provides over self-publishing the book yourself.
The book will sell because of what you have created and how well you promote it. It is incredibly valuable information. The cover graphic is so obviously someone else's concept that it is a distraction.
Posted by: David St Lawrence | May 05, 2006 at 06:28 AM
Hey man, you should really publish -some- aspect of your Long Tail content through my site--Lulu.com. We're betting the farm on long tail publishing and print-on-demand technology, and you're right on.
Either way, I am really looking forward to your book and recommending it as required reading to everyone in the content distribution business.
Henry
Operations Director
Lulu.com
Posted by: Henry Hutton | May 17, 2006 at 06:10 PM
We are looking forward to listening to this audiobook at Soundbooks
and in fact selling heaps of it.
We are a very comprehensive audiobook shop based in Australia.
With kind regards
Posted by: Chris RAYNOR | April 20, 2007 at 07:04 PM