I'm a huge fan of RSS feeds, in part because they're perfect for niche media. You don't have to publish every day to earn your way to my reading habits. Just make sure you've got a feed and if your focus intersects with my interests, I'll subscribe. When you publish I'll get it--no need for me to bookmark it and make a note to check it regularily. (I've written more about this here).
At this point virtually everything I read is via a feed, with one glaring exception--my Wikipedia watchlist. It's the only bookmark I still use. So I was delighted to discover this morning that finally Wikipedia has feeds! Thanks to Steve Rubel for the heads-up:
Wikipedia has added RSS feeds to the 1.25 million entries in the encyclopedia. This means you can now more easily track the revision history for important articles, such as those about people, brands or corporations. Simply click on the history link at the top of any entry page and you will see the RSS link on the left hand side
Yes, wikipedia's feedless existence is long overdue. How great will it be when we can have feeds for personal relationships, that way I never have to hear unecessary nagging, bragging, or shagging again:)
-Ben
Posted by: Ben | July 14, 2006 at 01:01 PM
Call this the new death pool. Someone can just aggregate every name of any importance from Wikipedia via RSS, and note when any feed adds the word "died" or a death year. Just one application, but I would guess a popular one--especially among journalists.
Posted by: Glenn Fleishman | July 14, 2006 at 05:00 PM
I sort of liked feeds - but missed the graphic design of the sites I was reading; that alone didn't stop me from using them, but I also have concerns about the constant polling of RSS aggregators and the bandwidth being used for that. We need some sort of "ping to aggregator" service that notifies subscribers when a new entry is available so they can read it when it's ready.
Posted by: Tim | July 15, 2006 at 11:05 AM
I wanted to point out that, like Wikipedia, we recently launched RSS feeds for every artist in Rhapsody. Now, if you’ve got a favorite artist, you can use these RSS feeds to get automatic updates whenever Rhapsody adds new music from that artist or when new playlists are uploaded featuring music from that artist.
From our perspective, this makes music discovery via Rhapsody virtually effortless, and takes the onus off consumers to actively seek out new music from their favorite artists via the service.
It’s pretty easy to find these feeds. Just go to Rhapsody.com, search for an artist, and click through to that artist’s page. On the right side of the screen, there’s a link for [BAND] feeds (ex. Stereolab feeds). You can also manually add feeds; the convention for the feeds is pretty easy -- just type http://www.rhapsody.com/BANDNAME/rss.html (example: http://www.rhapsody.com/stereolab/rss.html). From there, you can access several feeds per band.
Posted by: Matt | July 16, 2006 at 06:38 PM
Thanks for the heads up on this, Chris. I got the news about wikipedia's newsfeed from reading your feed. Natch.
Posted by: S.I. | July 27, 2006 at 11:23 AM
Wikipedia also has an API which allows you to fetch your watchlist itself as a RSS/ATOM feed. Here and here are two scripts that you can use to access this API.
Unfortunately, the feeds that are returned do not seem to be updated very regularly right now.
Posted by: Jyotirmoy Bhattacharya | March 04, 2007 at 07:52 PM
Wikipedia's basic nature attracts vandalism. Wikipedia depends on users to fix such stuff up. I occasionally find such sightings on less visited pages.
Posted by: tisane | October 27, 2009 at 02:21 AM
Nice post .. I just wonder that why i could not found this post before. It is really mind blowing.I am wondering if I can share your article in the bookmarks of society.Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.
Posted by: xmas gifts | November 30, 2009 at 05:45 AM