Ron Paul as "America's First Long Tail Candidate"
So says Newsweek:.
[The Long Tail] idea is now playing a part in our politics, where Paul's recent rise reflects the same dynamics. In 1988 his libertarian message—reduce government at home, resist military meddling abroad, restore the gold standard—went unheard. Today, it's spreading quickly online and connecting activists across the country, a few people at a time. Paul may still be the longest of long shots. But he's a long shot who can lure 5,000 supporters to his rallies and more than triple his entire '88 war chest in a single $6.6 million day. That's a whole new level of high-passion, low-polling politics—and in a long-tail world, others are bound to follow. "Ron Paul is the harbinger," says Nick Gillespie, editor in chief of the libertarian magazine Reason. "Just as the major entertainment companies are producing far more varied and individualized fare, I think we're going to see more and more political candidates who are more interesting in and of themselves but deliver smaller and smaller numbers."
Over the decades, Americans have become increasingly unhappy about having to cram themselves into one of two "big box" parties. Seven of the last 10 elections were won with less than 51 percent of the vote; in three of the last four, no candidate won a majority. Today, two thirds of U.S. adults (and a full three quarters of 18- to 30-year olds) say they would consider voting for an independent candidate in the next election. The rise of Howard Dean (another anti-establishment Web phenom) and the recall of California Gov. Gray Davis mirrored this breakdown of consensus; 2008's fragmented Republican field is further proof. "The long tail is not the political center," economist Arnold Kling has said. "It is not a third party waiting to form. It is not a coalition. It is not a 'silent majority' of either the right or left. It is simply every variety of political belief that does not fit within the two major parties." As the Web allows niche voters to form communities, raise money and get heard, it's inevitable that the major-party machines will clash with—and ultimately accommodate—the individualized constituencies they're struggling to serve.
The whole thing is interesting and worth a read. I try to avoid politics myself and really don't know much about Paul, but I get asked about the Long Tail of politics a lot. It's good to see that Newsweek seems to have come to the same conclusions about the increasing dissatisfaction with two "big box" parties that I've been seeing.
[illustration from Newsweek article]



Mr. Anderson,
Illuminating post on Ron Paul as the first long tail candidate. You've probably noticed that if you write about Ron Paul, you get a spike in traffic. His lunatic legions are also all over Digg...and I only mean to say that they vote everything and everything up the charts. As such, an interesting "counter revolution" is taking place with some satirists going against Ron Paul and getting pushed up by the very people making fun of them.
Looks like some of them think he's going to buy out the MySpace homepage on January 3rd!
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_To_Buy_Out_MySpace_Homepage_For_Iowa_Caucuses
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Whether_They_Like_it_or_Not_MySpace_Users_To_Pay_Ron_Paul_2
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_Cologne
http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/The_Next_Bomb_For_Ron_Paul_Iowa_and_New_Hampshire_to_Add_Internet_Voting
Seth
Posted by: Seth Barnes | December 31, 2007 at 03:16 PM
Not all who want smaller less bloated & corrupt government are lunatics.
The truth of the matter is that politics is facing it's digital revolution. And the politicos are confused. Why?
Because their telephone polls and such do not reflect Ron Paul's popularity. But Ron Paul is very popular with a younger crowd. People in their 20's and 30's many of whom do not even own a landline. (I have my broadband internet via cable and my wife and I both have cell phones. No landline. Many of my friends are likewise. Why waste $40 on a landline we'll never use.)
And while the mainstream media and politicos try to give Ron Paul zero coverage (okay, so they gave him some news the day he raked in $5 million - that's about it).
But driving from PA to CT I saw one Huckabee sign. And 3-4 Ron Paul signs. Nobody else...
It's a grass roots movement unlike any other. And while Ron Paul may not win...rest assured this is the future. The politicos may not realize it yet. But the game is changing....
Posted by: Jason The Saj | January 02, 2008 at 07:07 AM
Ron Paul's appeal is not just to conservatives who want to limit giving money to welfare but military spending in Iraq too. For all those Democrats saying how aweful the war is now that we are losing, sure were in favor of it when they all voted it in. I was against the war because it was Iraq was not then a terrorist nation while some of our major allies, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are. Ron Paul was asked about what he would do with the money when he pulled out of Iraq and he said he wouldn't mind spending it on healthcare and education when we save a lot of money on Iraq. Republicans and Democrats are against welfare unless it goes to bail out businesses, individual rights unless applied to corporations, and less spending when it comes to positive things like medical care for disabled veterans but are all for spending when it comes to more large weapons unnecessary for winning the war on terror like submarines. The reason why we don't see Ron Paul is because the media is controlled by large corporations which want conservatives like Republicans and Democrats to win the election. Of course the people who count the polls and the Supreme Court are bought off too. Remember last election that the people who made the voting machines in the battle ground states said they could guarantee Bush would win.
Posted by: Benjamin Huot | January 02, 2008 at 02:50 PM
I am a 48 yr old conservative and a member of my local GOP for 30 yrs. I noticed our traditional small government republcian party had "lost its way" a while back. Now after I have switched my support to the only true constitutional republican presidential candidate Dr./Congressman Ron Paul. I am not the only one who has jumped ship from the Neocon warmongers. There is absoutely nothing conservative about these folks other than they decided to add the word "conservative" on the end of their Neoconservative "label." I would just like to add that the neocon idealogy needs to be buried in the boneyard, never to be dugg up again. Ron Paul is middle americas candidate.
Posted by: Karla | January 02, 2008 at 07:24 PM
Chris,
I agree with this writer, the electoral college makes the concept of a long tail impossible. They contradict each other...
"American politics faces the same basic problem. That we have just two dominant political parties has nothing to do with information costs or media attention or lack of funding--it is the physical constraints of the market. We call this Duverger's Law. The principle states that in any plurality based voting system, elections eventually funnel towards two parties. Because of the district basis of the system, it is impossible for minor candidates to collect their small stakes in many communities into a significant voting block. Candidates win based on how many individual districts they can tally together, not how much overarching support they can garner. Third Parties exist as aggregates of minor factions spread throughout multiple constituencies but the electoral system doesn't care about percentage of the whole, only percentage of the local. It is innately compartmentalized, tied to the part to the point where the whole doesn't matter. Sound familiar? This is exactly what prevents a long tail economy from thriving in Borders or at a Tower Records."
http://www.ryanholiday.net/archives/why_i_dont_care_about_ron_paul.phtml
Posted by: Jeff Ritze | January 03, 2008 at 06:52 PM
Chris,
Looking at the numbers in Iowa and at the high number of first time voters, don't you think that the real (impact of) "long tail of politics" is in the electorate more than in a candidate, how people (especially young people) and new voters are engaged and how this turns into votes and shapes poltical outcomes?
Posted by: Alberto | January 04, 2008 at 05:31 AM
thanks...
Kabin
Konteyner
Posted by: kabin | June 13, 2009 at 10:14 AM