« The truth about "too cheap to meter" | Main | Barnes & Noble's Steve Riggio on Blockbusters »

September 15, 2008

Another Harvard professor helpfully suggests that we make hits

jquelch What is it about Harvard Business School professors and their embrace of the grindingly conventional pitched as fresh contrarianism? The latest is HBS marketing professor John Quelch, who bravely argues for, well, successful products:  Long-Tail Economics? Give Me Blockbusters!

Unlike these HBS professors, I’m actually in the blockbuster industry (Conde Nast editor), and I can confirm that blockbusters are indeed great when you happen to have one. The problem is that neither we nor anyone else can predict what will be a blockbuster or how to create them with any regularity.

So we can’t do much to improve our blockbuster batting average. But what we can do is become less dependent on them. And that’s the point of the Long Tail.

But Quelch thinks we've got it all wrong. Forget spreading your bets and embracing niches. Instead, make blockbusters! Okay. How? Well, he doesn't quite get to that. Instead, Quelch helpfully identifies the "five defining characteristics of blockbusters", all coincidentally starting with "S": [My comments are in brackets]

  1. Sheer size. A blockbuster has a transformational impact on a company and an industry, often opening up new markets worldwide. Blockbusters break sales records and exceed expectations. Around 100 pharmaceutical brands exceed $1 billion in annual sales. Procter & Gamble has 23 such brands. [A bit of a tautology, which says blockbusters are, well, blockbusters, but let's move on...]  
  2. Speed. It's not just the sales volume; it's the speed of the sales trajectory. Remember that the original blockbuster was a bomb that could destroy an entire city block. Blockbuster brands address pressing consumer needs so well that they often enjoy vertical sales liftoff. Think Viagra. [Huh? Did blockbuster bombs explode faster than other bombs? Can Viagra destroy an entire city block? I'm confused.]
  3. Scarcity. A blockbuster brand is often in such high demand that stock-outs and shortages occur in the market. Remember the consumer lines to buy the new iPhone? As imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, the speedy availability of counterfeits is another indicator of popularity. [Except for all the blockbusters that don't exhibit this unusual scarcity behavior, such as Hollywood blockbusters, music blockbusters, drug blockbusters and indeed virtually all blockbusters except for the aforementioned iPhone and a few toys around Christmas. Also, isn't widespread piracy the opposite of scarcity?]
  4. Sustainability. A blockbuster brand is not a one hit wonder. It is a gift that keeps on giving. Remember Intel's Pentium chip. Or look at the seven Harry Potter books and five companion movies. Adding DVD and merchandise sales, theme parks, etc., Advertising Age valued the Potter economy at $15 billion. [Except for all the blockbusters that are one-hit wonders, from pop music to the aforementioned drugs. Furthermore, including Intel's Pentium chip in this list is risible: it was the fifth generation of a chip architecture that began with the first personal computers and grew along with the industry. It sold more than the processors before it and less than the processors after it. Does that make every component in a PC a blockbuster, simply because a lot of PCs are sold?
  5. Sizzle. A blockbuster does not just address an important need. It does so in an exciting and accessible way. Pfizer's Lipitor was not the first cholesterol reducer but superior marketing and sales made Lipitor number one. And in the movie world, think of the magical and memorable special effects in the Star Wars series. [Comparing Lipitor to Star Wars special effects? Priceless. This is what it takes to become a Harvard Business School professor, folks]

It’s like the "Give Peace a Chance" bumper stickers on the old Volvos here in Berkeley. Good advice. If only it were so easy.

[thanks to Robin Koskinen for the tip]

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfb6353ef010534ae6fde970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Another Harvard professor helpfully suggests that we make hits:

Comments

Chris
Read the article carefully please. He does not say HOW to make blockbusters. He asks "What makes a blockbuster". That's like defining a blockbuster NOT telling you how to go make one happen.

To address that question i.e. "What makes a blockbuster"? He has given his "criteria".

Quelch = owned

His comments remind me of a video from South Park:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lSQ18s2EFI

1. Make a blockbuster
2. ???????
3. Profit!

Thanks for all the posts Chris!

Reminiscent of Rockefeller three rules for creation of wealth:
1. Get up early
2. Work hard
3. Find oil

Matt and Gregory,

Those are genius, and unbelievably I hadn't hear either. You've enriched my day!

I'd encourage everyone to check out that South Park video, which is just 20 seconds long. It involves underpants.

I think we can classify any trendy new fusion restaurant as a blockbuster based on Quelch's criteria. But, doesn't the food industry make most of their profits in the long tail of compliments such as drinks and deserts? Is it more profitable to keep a well-stocked wine cellar or serve the same "block-buster" dish for 10 years?

Now if I could just have Marty fetch me my DeLorean and next decade's newspaper, I'll be all set :)

Its amazing how hindsight's 20/20.

Pfizer almost killed Lipitor by the way. It took a passionate evangelist in the labs to get the drug out to the market...I think I read somewhere that Marissa Meyer almost killed AdSense as well...

I'd revise the steps to better capture the "Quelch doctrine" as follows:

1. ???????
2. Massive Profit!
3. Use qualities of #1 to define a blockbuster

What his theory seems to be missing is that only a very small portion of the ??????? is going to get to step 2, and the investment in all of those ones that don't make it cuts into the step 2 profits.

Thank you very much for the information I really appreciate it!!

Chris, please make a post talking about this new article (http://www.prsformusic.com/monline/research/Documents/The%20long%20tail%20of%20P2P%20v9.pdf) The authors made an increadible study about music downloads and sales with BigChampaigne data and they conclude saying that there is no long tail in the music industry. Im really looking forward to see what you think about the study. Regards, Pablo Tupinambá

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Tidbits

Search this site

The Long Tail by Chris Anderson

Notes and sources for the book

FREE will be available in all digital forms--ebook, web book, and audiobook--for free shortly after the hardcover is published on July 7th (exact dates will be announced here as each form is released). The ebook and web book will be free for a limited time, the unabridged audiobook will be available free forever.[Update: the first free versions have now been released.]

Order the hardcover now!